VillageGirl asked, "Nathan : Why do think this disproves the existance of higher intelligence?"
It is called "the preponderance of evidence."
In the 18th century and earlier, most scientists held that the Bible was the inspired word of God and they would make way for popes and priests to spout their imaginings of "things Divine" as though the popes and priests were accurately reporting the features of an undiscovered country to which only popes and priests had access. The underlying presumption was that as man's knowledge grew, so would his conviction that there was an Author of All Creation who only asked that we worship Him.
But things didn't work out that way, did they? As man investigated the universe, at each level, instead of finding signposts that said, "This way to God; Worship Him," evidence accumulated to show that "No GOD need apply here."
No doubt about it, we've developed some nifty tools. We can examine and manipulate individual atoms, and we can peer futher and further back into time. Many marvelous and astonishing things remain to be discovered: tomorrow, next week, a year from now, a century from now.
And nowhere will there be a sign that says, "This way to God."
There is no Creator, there is no spirit realm, complete with all the fixings. Shit happens, and this shit is it.
Enjoy your imaginitive flights of fancy about God, but remember that you have no evidence at all for it, only "what-ifs" and "maybes".
WHICH of the ten thousand things called "God" is the right one?
That's a trick question; the correct answer is NONE.
Popes and priests and other god-hustlers are only saying what the mooing herd wants to hear. They are parasites and suck life out of mankind.